SOFTWARE THAT EVOLVES WITH ITS MEMBERS

You post the problem.
We ship the change.

Four products for marketing, sales and running a business. A practitioner steward decides on every request in public within ten business days, an AI development team builds it, and the changelog names the member who asked.

LevelUp

LevelUp application screenshot
Velocity

Velocity application screenshot
Publish

Publish application screenshot
Producer

Producer application screenshot

Decision within ten business daysDeclines published with the reasonThe changelog names the memberYour data. Your AI keys.

[4] days

Request to decision, median

[6] days

Decision to ship, median

[23]

Changes shipped this month

[71]%

Started as a member’s problem

Sample values. Live figures are published monthly. How the scorecard works.


The four products

Four products. One rule: AI does the work, a person is at the gate.

All four run on your own AI keys, with no metering inside. Every one of them is evolved by the people who use it.

LevelUpLive

The second brain.

One workspace for everything you’re carrying in your head. Tasks, notes, goals, habits, calendar and money, reviewed on a rhythm, with an assistant that does the work.

Holds that the weekly review is the keystone.

About LevelUp

LevelUp application screenshot
VelocityEarly access

One job: get sales meetings booked.

Find the right people, reach them with outreach written for each one, and book the meeting. Nothing sends without a human or a dial you set.

Holds that every fact carries its source and a confidence score.

About Velocity

Velocity application screenshot
PublishLive

The content engine that runs mostly on its own.

Research, drafts, review, publishing and distribution to fifteen networks. Claims are sourced, not asserted. Your job is decisions.

Holds that silence means all clear.

About Publish

Publish application screenshot
ProducerWindows · v0.1.0

Drop a screen recording. Get a finished demo video.

Transcribed, scripted, narrated, built and verified on your machine, with a person at three gates.

Holds that the footage is the source of truth.

About Producer

Producer application screenshot

How a problem becomes a change

Six stages, six colours, one loop. Each stage has something you can see and a time we commit to. These commitments are the only promises we make.

The six-stage loop from a member problem to a shipped change: Request, Decision, Build, Verify, Ship, Tell, then again every week
Request stage icon

Stage 1

Request

A member posts a problem in the product’s category. The AI team asks its clarifying questions in the thread within hours.

What you see

The thread, the questions, the answers

We commit

First response within one business day

Decision stage icon

Stage 2

Decision

The steward reads the thread and the usage evidence and marks it Under review, Planned or Declined, with the reason.

What you see

The status and the reason, in public

We commit

Decision within ten business days

Build stage icon

Stage 3

Build

The AI team implements the change in a branch behind a flag.

What you see

A build log: what was read, what was written, what was run

We commit

Started within the published sprint

Verify stage icon

Stage 4

Verify

Automated regression, layout, accessibility and data-consistency checks, then a small member testing cohort.

What you see

The check results and the testers’ notes

We commit

No release without a passing check

Ship stage icon

Stage 5

Ship

Flag on for testers, then for everyone. The changelog entry names the member who raised the problem.

What you see

The changelog, the help article, the flag

We commit

Weekly release window

Tell stage icon

Stage 6

Tell

A short changelog video and a monthly community call walk through what changed and why.

What you see

The video, the call, the recording

We commit

Weekly video, monthly call

Two details matter more than the rest. Declines are published with reasons. A community that only sees acceptances assumes silence means nobody read the request. The changelog names the member. Credit turns a list of fixes into a record of the community’s influence. The full model, with its guardrails.


The queue · live

What members asked for, and what we did about it.

Product The problem Raised by Status Decided in Shipped
Velocity Expired meeting proposals could still be approved and sent, so a prospect could receive an invitation full of past dates. LSI Media LLC Shipped 1 day 5 Sep 2026
Producer A release recording has long stretches of a terminal scrolling, and the script treats them as evidence and narrates them. LSI Media LLC Shipped 3 days 8 Sep 2026
LevelUp Decision notes never show up in the weekly review, so the same question gets re-decided twice and the reason is lost by Friday. LSI Media LLC Shipped 3 days 4 Sep 2026
Publish The changelog article needs the member’s name and the request thread in a fixed place, and drafts keep putting them in different paragraphs. LSI Media LLC Shipped 3 days 9 Sep 2026
LevelUp The daily digest lists bills due but not the budget categories already over for the month, so I find out at the weekly review, a week late. LSI Media LLC Building 4 days behind a flag
Publish Social variants go out the moment an article publishes, but the changelog video renders an hour later, so the posts have no video. LSI Media LLC Building 4 days behind a flag
Velocity Members who went quiet get the same re-engagement copy as cold prospects, and it reads wrong to someone who already paid us. LSI Media LLC Shipped 5 days 8 Sep 2026
Producer Every weekly changelog video needs the same cold open and close, and I re-type the brief each time. LSI Media LLC Building 2 days behind a flag
Velocity Let the engine skip the daily send cap for a campaign that is converting.
Declined by the steward: daily caps, warmup and suppressions apply to every sender and no mode removes them; the charter says so in one line.
LSI Media LLC Declined 1 day

Every request gets a decision within ten business days. Declines are public, with the reason. Shipped entries name the member who asked.


The thesis

Every SaaS company has a feedback board. Almost none of them can afford to act on it.

Software has always been shaped by its users in theory and by its engineering backlog in practice. The gap between the two is where most product frustration lives. Engineering time is the scarce resource, and every request competes with the roadmap.

MeYouSocial inverts that. An AI development team makes the cost of building a change small enough that the scarce resource becomes judgment: deciding what is worth building, for whom, and what the product should refuse to become. That judgment comes from practitioners in marketing, sales and entrepreneurship who use the tools themselves, and from a community of members whose real problems set the agenda.

The result is not a suite of finished products with a suggestion box attached. It is a set of products that are permanently in motion, with a visible loop from a member’s problem to a shipped change, and a community that can watch the loop run.

1

The cost of building collapsed

An AI development team can take a well-described problem to a verified, tested change in days. Producer is the proof inside the family already: a screen recording to a finished, checked video with a human at three gates and an agent doing the rest.

2

Practitioners encode their judgment directly

The best parts of the products are opinions, not features. LevelUp insists on a weekly review. Publish refuses to publish an unsourced claim. Velocity will not send anything without a human or a dial the human set.

3

Ownership moved to the customer

All four products run on the member’s own AI keys with no metering inside the app. The subscription does not pay for tokens. It pays for the evolution of the product.


The suite as evidence

The most persuasive proof that the model works is that the company runs on it.

Producer makes the weekly changelog video from a screen recording of the release.

Publish writes the article, sources the claims, and distributes the video to every network on the publish day.

Velocity runs outreach to prospects and re-engages members who have gone quiet, with every send behind the approval queue.

LevelUp holds the roadmap, the steward’s weekly review, and the decision log.

Each of those is a workflow members can copy for their own businesses. The community learns how to run a company on the products by watching one being run.


Three ways in.

Tiers differ in involvement, never in whose requests get built. The apps run on your own AI keys: no metering, no credits, no tokens inside them.

Member

$49

per month

  • All four products: LevelUp, Velocity, Publish and Producer
  • The community and the request queue
  • The changelog, every week, with the video
  • The monthly community call, live or recorded
  • The member courses, as each is released

Contributor Recommended

$99

per month

  • Everything in Member
  • Early access to changes behind flags
  • A seat in the testing cohort
  • Office hours with the stewards

Founding

$999

per year · limited to 50 founding members

  • Everything in Contributor
  • Lifetime recognition in the changelog and on the site
  • A named advisory slot on one product
  • First call on new products

Prices in US dollars, billed monthly for Member and Contributor and yearly for Founding. The Founding tier is limited to fifty founding members and closes when the cohort is full. Enterprise builds for one organisation are priced as projects and kept separate from the community queue.


Start with a problem, not a plan.

Join, post the problem that costs you the most time, and watch what happens within ten business days.

Become a member